Shooting an Elephant captures a universal experience of going against ones own humanity at the cost of a part of that humanity).
Analytical, summary, shooting an, elephant by george Orwell
Orwell, unable to stand the elephants suffering and unable to watch and listen to it, goes away. The elephant, like the burmese people, has become the unwitting victim of the British imperialists need to save face. No one is great stronger for the experience. Orwell candidly depicts his unsympathetic actions both in shooting the elephant and in the aftermath, when he is among his fellow British police officers. He is relieved, he admits, that the coolie died, because it gave him a pretext for shooting the elephant. As far as his fellow officers are concerned, he did the right thing. As far as the natives are concerned, he saved face. Yet Orwell concludes, i often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool. Throughout the essay, orwell weaves his thesis about the effects of imperialism not only on the oppressed but on the oppressors, as well. He says that every white mans life in the east was one long struggle not to be laughed at, that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys, and that the imperialist becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy. Orwells essay, however, is more than one persons riveting narrative english about the beginning of an awareness.
He begins to anthropomorphize the elephant, changing the pronouns from it to he, referring to the elephants preoccupied grandmotherly air, and concluding that it would be murder to shoot the elephant. Despite Orwells aversion to shooting the elephant, he becomes suddenly aware that he will lose face and be humiliated if he does not shoot. He therefore shoots the elephant. The death itself is sustained in excruciating detail. After three shots, the elephant still does not die. Orwell fires his two remaining shots into the elephants heart. He sends someone to get his small rifle, then pours shot after shot into his heart and down his throat. Still, the elephant does not die.
Orwell, the narrator, has already begun to question the presence of the British in the far East. He says that, theoretically and secretly, he was all for the burmese and all against their oppressors, the British. Orwell qualitative describes himself as young and ill-educated, bitterly hating his job. Orwells job, in this instance, is to respond to a report of the death of a local man who was killed by an elephant in musth. Orwell finds the man lying on his belly with arms crucified and head sharply twisted to the side. The corpse grins with an expression of unendurable agony. At this point, Orwell feels the collective will of the crowd urging him to shoot the elephant, but Orwell, knowing that the elephant is probably no longer dangerous, has no intention of shooting the elephant.
In the end Orwell was glad the coolie was killed because it put me legally in the right and it gave me sufficient pretext for shooting the elephant (109). Throughout the essay orwell discuss his two alternating voices that are going on inside of his head. One the moral side he knew that killing the elephant was an unjust thing. He knew that the elephant had done what it had done not because it wasn t tame, but because it was reacting to its mating habits. The other voice revealed that he knew shooting the elephant is immoral but looking like a coward is something far worse. His emotions of his hatred of Imperialism come shining through in his second voice. Based on Orwells experience with the Indian Imperial Police (1922-1927 Shooting an Elephant is set in moulmein, in Lower Burma.
Shooting an, elephant, essay, essay, summary of "
He said, a white man mustn t be freighted in front of natives (108). The thought he was having at this moment was of how the burmese would react if he were to be trampled. And if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh (108). In Orwell s mind that would never world do (108). The only alternative was to kill the elephant. As the crowd was around him he felt there presence force him to pull the trigger and when he did he described the crowds reaction as a roar of devilish glee (108). Although the first shoot did not kill the elephant he kept filling the animal with bullets until it died.
He heard later that it took the elephant a half an hour to die. Even as the elephant lie there dying the burmese people started to pick the elephant apart for meat. After the incident there were many discussions about the shooting of the elephant. When the owner returned he was quite mad, but he was an Indian so there was nothing he could do about. Some of the older men said it was the right thing to do, and the younger men said, it was a damn shame to shoot an elephant for killing a coolie, because an elephant was worth more write (109).
Later it was reported that the elephant had killed a lower class man. As soon as Orwell saw the body he sent for an elephant soon as the rifle arrived a crowd began to form behind Orwell. The people that had once hated him have now become his supporters. When he arrived at the elephant Orwell said i ought not to shoot him (107). He was almost certain that his mating temptations were passing and that the animal would not do anymore harm, but in case the elephant did he would be there ready. He looked back at the immense crowd that followed him to the elephant, and he thought to himself they did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands I was momentarily worth watching (107).
He felt the crowd pressuring him to kill the elephant and that s when he decided he had to what was expected of him. He knew in his mind that he didn t want to kill the animal he just doesn t want to look foolish. He thought about the animal s owner and how he would react. He also thought it always seems worse to kill a large animal (108). He knew what he ought. He ought to walk up to the elephant to test his behavior. Then he thought that the idea is a bad one because of the soft ground from the rain. He would not be able to move fast enough if the animal were to charge at him. At this point he wasn t very fearful of himself but of the faces that watch him.
Summary of, shooting an, elephant, essay
This reason was because Orwell was a european and empire the burmese didn t take kindly to europeans since they were treating the burmese terribly. Orwell knew that the imperialism of the europeans was a horrible thing and according to him he was all for the burmese and all against their oppressors, the British (104). Even though he already knew that the British and imperialism was wrong a tiny incident happened one day that he explains gave me a better glimpse that I had before of the real nature of imperialism (105).Early one morning Orwell received resume a call from the. It was reported that an elephant has escaped and was terrorizing a bazaar, and that Orwell should come and try and do something. The elephant was not a wild elephant but an elephant that was going though its mating process. The elephant was chained up but had broken loose. The only person who can control the elephant had went searching for the animal but had gone the wrong was and now was twelve hours away. It was reported that the animal had destroyed a bamboo hut, killed a cow, and destroyed a municipal rubbish van.
I think this is an example of difference of opinion. On the whole, most people, like orwell subside to peer pressure, simply to avoid looking like a fool or what they consider to look like a fool. Peer pressure can make plan or break a person especially this day in time. Shooting An Elephant Essay, research, paper, shooting. Elephant, by george Orwell is a story how a young Orwell, while stationed in Colonial Burma, became disillusioned with Imperialism. On one occasion he was faced with the dilemma of having to destroy a wild elephant that had gotten loose in the town he was stationed. Throughout the story the reader will be able to see two alternating voices of Orwell. The first voice is a justification of his actions, while the other voice revels an honest excuse as to why he shot the elephant. Orwell s powerful phrases and words will give the reader a better understanding of why he had to destroy this magnificent the town of moulmein, in Colonel Burma, where Orwell was stationed he claimed that he was hated by a large number of people (104).
out that there could possibly. For example, he asked some of the villagers if they had seen the elephant. Some said that the elephant went to the left and some said that the elephant went to the right and some did not even know about the elephant at all. The people seemed to be only out for themselves. They were not interested in the situation until they found out that they might be able to benefit from. This is typical of people in any culture, especially in present times. In the last paragraph of Orwells essay, there had been two men that had feelings on the shooting of the elephant. One implied that it was okay that the elephant had been shot and that it was justified. The other implied that the elephant was worth more alive than a dead Indian coolie was. This also is typical of certain people in this world today.
He did not have his ducks in a row, so to speak. I dont think that Orwell was one to function under pressure. He would give in to what he thought the people of Burma wanted, not to what he wanted. But secretly inside he hated the environment in which he lived, he hated the imperialistic government in which resided in Burma. He hated the residents of Burma. He stated that he would love to stick his bayonette words into the stomach of a buddhist priest. He felt all of this hatred for the people around him, but yet he felt as if he had to go along with everything and everyone else just to live in harmony.
George Orwells, shooting an, elephant : a summary and Reflection
Human Nature, in Shooting an Elephant, human nature literature is the same as it would be in just about any story that we would read or hear. Human nature is no different in Burma than anywhere else in the world. In this story we see different degrees of human nature, from completely normal to in some cases extreme. This essay is mainly focused on peer pressure. Should I shoot the elephant or should I not? Or Will I lose face with these people if I dont shoot the elephant? In this essay, i will discuss the traits of the different characters. Orwell was the kind of person that did not have a very high self-esteem.